methods in are a source of a lot of problems for many developers getting into . The pattern that we’re suggested to use is of course , but there are cases — like with Event Handlers in C# — where the method signatures just aren’t compatible. async void C# writing async await code async Task In this article, I’ll explain why methods in C# are something you want to avoid. We’ll cover some code examples that compare and for better understanding, and I’ll also explain what you should do if you have no other choice but . async void async void async Task async void What Are async void Methods in C#? In C#, methods are a way to define asynchronous methods that don’t return a value. These methods are typically used for event handlers or other scenarios where the method signature being enforced does not support a return type and instead is enforced. async void Task void methods are defined by using the keyword before the method signature, followed by the return type . For example: async void async void public async void SomeMethod()
{
    // Code here
} When compared to regular asynchronous methods that return a or , there are a few important differences to note. And when I say “important” I mean “You really need to avoid this as much as you humanly can so you save yourself some headaches”. Task Task<T> Differences Between async void And async Task in CSharp One of the main differences between methods and methods lies in how exceptions are handled. [async void](https://www.devleader.ca/2023/01/27/async-void-how-to-tame-the-asynchronous-nightmare/) async Task In methods, any exceptions that occur are captured by the returned object. This allows the calling code to handle the exception or await the to observe any exceptions later. This is how the entire infrastructure has been built in C#. It’s often why you’ll see async await get introduced into a codebase and then all of the calling code starts getting converted over to also be async await — You really DO want it there. async Task Task Task async await On the other hand, methods cannot be awaited directly, and any exceptions that occur within them will be bubbled up to… where? The SynchronizationContext that started the async method in the first place. Even Stephen Cleary from Microsoft mentions in his article: async void With async void methods, there is no Task object, so any exceptions thrown out of an async void method will be raised directly on the SynchronizationContext that was active when the async void method started. illustrates that exceptions thrown from async void methods can’t be caught naturally. Figure 2 Stephen Cleary Code Example of async Task vs async void Methods in C# It’ll be helpful to compare two variations of the same layout of code using each of these patterns to see how the issues can arise. Consider the following example that uses async Task: public async Task ProcessDataAsync()
{
    // Some asynchronous operations
}

public async void HandleButtonClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    try
    {
        await ProcessDataAsync();
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        // Handle the exception
    }
} In this code, if an exception occurs in the event handler method, it will be caught by the try-catch block in the method and can be appropriately handled. ProcessDataAsync HandleButtonClick However, if is defined as instead, any exceptions thrown by would bypass the catch block in the event handler method and potentially crash the application: ProcessDataAsync `async void` ProcessDataAsync HandleButtonClick public async void ProcessDataAsync()
{
    // Some asynchronous operations
}

public async void HandleButtonClick(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
    try
    {
        ProcessDataAsync();
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        // This will never catch the async exceptions!
    }
} The Dangers of async void Methods in C# The common theme that you’re hopefully noticing in this article is that methods in C# are dangerous and something you should be trying to avoid. Here’s a list of challenges that we get with methods, to hopefully steer you away from using them (unless you have no choice): async void [async void](https://www.devleader.ca/2023/01/27/async-void-how-to-tame-the-asynchronous-nightmare/) : methods do not allow errors to be caught or propagated. When an exception occurs within such a method, it escapes to the synchronization context, often resulting in an unhandled exception that can crash the application. Error Propagation async void : Unlike methods, methods cannot be awaited. This can lead to issues with controlling the flow of asynchronous operations, potentially causing race conditions or executing operations out of the intended order. Awaiting Behavior async Task async void : Debugging exceptions in methods is more challenging because the call stack may not accurately represent the execution flow at the time the exception was thrown, complicating the process of identifying and fixing bugs. Debugging Difficulty async void Best Practices for Handling async void Methods in C# When working with async void methods in C#, it is important to be aware of their potential dangers and follow best practices to ensure a robust and reliable codebase. Here are some recommendations for handling async void methods cautiously: Avoid whenever possible: methods should generally be avoided, especially in scenarios where exception handling and error recovery are critical. While async void methods may appear convenient, they cannot propagate exceptions and can result in unpredictable program behavior. Instead, consider using methods, which provide better error-handling capabilities. async void async void async Task Use instead: By using the return type for asynchronous methods, you can take advantage of the Task’s built-in exception handling mechanism. This enables you to catch and handle exceptions appropriately, ensuring that your code maintains control over the execution flow. Using methods also allows for better code maintainability, testability, and fewer mysterious problems than . async Task async Task async Task async void Handle exceptions in methods: If you must use methods, it is important to properly handle exceptions to prevent them from silently propagating and causing unexpected system behavior. One way to achieve this is by enclosing the code within a try/catch block. Within the catch block, you can log the exception and handle it accordingly, such as displaying an error message to the user or rolling back any relevant operations. async void async void Log and monitor asynchronous operations: When working with methods, logging and monitoring become even more critical. Since these methods do not have a return type, it becomes challenging to determine their completion or identify any potential issues. Implementing a robust logging and monitoring system, such as using a logging framework like Serilog or utilizing application insights, can help track the progress and status of your asynchronous operations, aiding in debugging and troubleshooting. async void Try/Catch for async void Methods in C# , but ultimately it feels like making sure you wrap every method body in try/catch is the most straightforward. Maybe someone can create a Rosyln analyzer to enforce this? I’ve written about several different ways to try working with this kind of code before async void Here’s an example demonstrating how you can use a try-catch around the entire body of code that is : async void public async void DoSomethingAsync()
{
    try
    {
        // Perform asynchronous operations
        await Task.Delay(1000);
        await SomeAsyncMethod();
    }
    catch (Exception ex)
    {
        // TODO: ... whatever you need to do to properly report
        // on issues in your async void calls so that you
        // can debug them more effectively.

        // Log the exception and handle it appropriately
        Logger.Error(ex, "An error occurred while executing DoSomethingAsync");
        // Display an error message or take necessary action
        DisplayErrorMessage("Oops! Something went wrong. Please try again later.");
    }
} By adhering to these best practices, you can mitigate the risks associated with methods and avoid a pile of neverending headaches. Remember to prioritize using methods whenever possible for better exception handling and control over the asynchronous execution flow — you don’t want to add anywhere unless it’s an absolute last resort. async void async Task really async void Wrapping up async void Methods in C# In conclusion, methods in C# can be dangerous for several reasons, and you’ll want to prioritize NOT using them. There are unfortunate situations where APIs and method signatures do not line up, such as Event Handlers, but otherwise, do your best to avoid these. async void By using , we lose the ability to await or handle exceptions properly. This can lead to unhandled exceptions and unexpected behavior in our code. To avoid these hazards, I recommend that you use for methods that are intended to be asynchronous wherever you possibly can. This allows us to await the result, handle exceptions, and have better control over our code’s execution flow. It promotes better error handling and improves overall code quality. When you have no other choice, make sure you are wrapping your entire async void method in a try/catch and investing in proper error handling/logging/reporting. async void async Task Approach async programming with caution and continuously seek to enhance your understanding of the topic! If you found this useful and you’re looking for more learning opportunities, consider and check out my ! if you want to connect with me and other software engineers on these types of topics! subscribing to my free weekly software engineering newsletter free videos on YouTube Check out my Discord community Also published . here

This story contains new, firsthand information uncovered by the writer.

Too Long; Didn't Read

In your car, at home, or at work — Bosch technology shapes many areas of life.

The Dangers of Using async void Methods In C#

Too Long; Didn't Read

Dev Leader

STORY’S CREDIBILITY

Original Reporting

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

The Dangers of Using async void Methods In C#

Too Long; Didn't Read

Dev Leader

STORY’S CREDIBILITY

Original Reporting

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES