paint-brush
Meta's Dirty Secrets: How the Parent Company of Facebook and Instagram Conceals its Harmful Tacticsby@metaeatsbrains

Meta's Dirty Secrets: How the Parent Company of Facebook and Instagram Conceals its Harmful Tactics

by Save the Kids From MetaNovember 2nd, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Meta is aware of the addictive and harmful effects of its platform features but chooses to downplay and misrepresent this knowledge in public discourse. Despite internal awareness, company leaders have repeatedly emphasized the benefits of their platforms while refusing to acknowledge the negative impacts on children's mental health, creating a deceptive image of social media's effects.
featured image - Meta's Dirty Secrets: How the Parent Company of Facebook and Instagram Conceals its Harmful Tactics
Save the Kids From Meta HackerNoon profile picture

The United States v Meta Platforms Court Filing October 24, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 24 of 100.

10. Meta knows its Platform features are addictive and harmful, but misrepresents and omits this information in public discourse.

414. Meta understands the cyclical and harmful nature of its psychologically manipulative features, but persists in subjecting young users to those features, choosing to downplay and deny the harmful aspects of its Platforms instead of correcting those problems.


415. During a congressional hearing on March 25, 2021, Zuckerberg stated he did not believe Meta’s Platforms harm children. Instead, Zuckerberg suggested that Meta’s Platforms are good for teens and adults alike because they “help people stay connected to people they care about, which I think is one of the most fundamental and important human things that we do.”


416-417. [Redacted]


418. In 2019 and 2020, Zuckerberg and Mosseri met multiple times with Jonathan Haidt, a New York University professor studying the effects of social media on teens’ mental health. [Redacted] Haidt recalled that “[i]t was not suggested to me that they had internal research showing a problem.”


419. At the March 25, 2021 congressional hearing, Zuckerberg was asked whether passive consumption of social media content, like that promoted by Instagram’s infinite scroll, harmed children’s mental health. Zuckerberg refused to give a yes or no answer, [Redacted] Zuckerberg again played up the benefits of Meta’s Platforms to the committee, stating that “[o]verall, the research that we have seen is that using social apps to connect with other people can have positive mental health benefits and well-being benefits by helping people feel more connected and less lonely.” [Redacted]


420-424. [Redacted]


425. In May 2021, Mosseri told reporters that the research he had seen suggested Instagram’s effects on teen well-being are likely “quite small,” as reported by the Wall Street Journal that September. [Redacted]


426. [Redacted]


427. Externally, Meta’s leadership continued to be evasive about the company’s research. On December 8, 2021, Mosseri told Congress, “I don’t believe that research suggests that our products are addictive.”


428. [Redacted]


429. Through these and other misrepresentations to young users, Congress, and members of the public regarding the negative effect its Platform features have on young users’ mental health—as well as Meta’s purported prioritization of teen well-being and safety over profits—Meta deceives the public about the qualities, nature, and effects of its Social Media Platforms.



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 4:23-cv-05448 retrieved on October 25, 2023, from Washingtonpost.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.